| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
28/06/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
BALKCOM, K.S.; TERRA, J.A.; SHAW, J.N.; REEVES, D.W.; RAPER, R.L. |
|
Afiliación : |
JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Soil management system and landscape position interactions on nutrient distribution in a coastal plain field. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2005 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Soils and Water Conservation, 2005, v.60 (6), p. 431-437. |
|
Descripción física : |
2-s2.0-34548703816 |
|
ISSN : |
0022-4561 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Contenido : |
Soil nutrient concentrations vary with soil management system and landscape position, but limited information exists describing these interactions within a heterogeneous field. A three year experiment was conducted to evaluate pH, phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and zinc (Zn) concentrations at three depths, 0 to 5 cm, 5 to 15 cm, and 15 to 30 cm (0 to 2 in, 2 to 6 in, and 6 to 12 in), and three landscape positions, summit, sideslope, and drainageway, in a 9 ha (22 ac) field containing four different management systems. Management systems consisted of a conventional (chisel plowing/disking in-row subsoiling with no cover crops) and conservation tillage system (in-row subsoiling with cover crops) with or without dairy bedding manure. Soils ranged from Aquic to Typic Paleudults. Manure applications increased pH and nutrient concentrations in the soil surface at 0 to 5 cm (0 to 2 in) of conventional and conservation tillage systems, with highest values measured in conservation tillage. Landscape position affected soil pH and P concentrations; however, depth and landscape position interactions were observed for soil pH, P, and K concentrations. The lowest soil pH and P concentrations were measured from the sideslope position, while K concentrations did not exhibit consistent distributions across landscape positions. Future soil testing of Coastal Plain fields to account for erosion of the landscape may help direct future sampling methodology and interpretations for nutrient management. MenosSoil nutrient concentrations vary with soil management system and landscape position, but limited information exists describing these interactions within a heterogeneous field. A three year experiment was conducted to evaluate pH, phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and zinc (Zn) concentrations at three depths, 0 to 5 cm, 5 to 15 cm, and 15 to 30 cm (0 to 2 in, 2 to 6 in, and 6 to 12 in), and three landscape positions, summit, sideslope, and drainageway, in a 9 ha (22 ac) field containing four different management systems. Management systems consisted of a conventional (chisel plowing/disking in-row subsoiling with no cover crops) and conservation tillage system (in-row subsoiling with cover crops) with or without dairy bedding manure. Soils ranged from Aquic to Typic Paleudults. Manure applications increased pH and nutrient concentrations in the soil surface at 0 to 5 cm (0 to 2 in) of conventional and conservation tillage systems, with highest values measured in conservation tillage. Landscape position affected soil pH and P concentrations; however, depth and landscape position interactions were observed for soil pH, P, and K concentrations. The lowest soil pH and P concentrations were measured from the sideslope position, while K concentrations did not exhibit consistent distributions across landscape positions. Future soil testing of Coastal Plain fields to account for erosion of the landscape may help direct future sampling methodology and inter... Presentar Todo |
|
Thesagro : |
AGRICULTURA DE PRECISIÒN; CONSERVACION DE SUELOS; FERTILIDAD; MANEJO DE SUELOS; NUTRIENTES; SUELOS; VARIABILIDAD ESPACIAL. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
P30 Ciencia del suelo y manejo del suelo |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02360naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1032799
005 2021-06-28
008 2005 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0022-4561
100 1 $aBALKCOM, K.S.
245 $aSoil management system and landscape position interactions on nutrient distribution in a coastal plain field.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2005
300 $c2-s2.0-34548703816
520 $aSoil nutrient concentrations vary with soil management system and landscape position, but limited information exists describing these interactions within a heterogeneous field. A three year experiment was conducted to evaluate pH, phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and zinc (Zn) concentrations at three depths, 0 to 5 cm, 5 to 15 cm, and 15 to 30 cm (0 to 2 in, 2 to 6 in, and 6 to 12 in), and three landscape positions, summit, sideslope, and drainageway, in a 9 ha (22 ac) field containing four different management systems. Management systems consisted of a conventional (chisel plowing/disking in-row subsoiling with no cover crops) and conservation tillage system (in-row subsoiling with cover crops) with or without dairy bedding manure. Soils ranged from Aquic to Typic Paleudults. Manure applications increased pH and nutrient concentrations in the soil surface at 0 to 5 cm (0 to 2 in) of conventional and conservation tillage systems, with highest values measured in conservation tillage. Landscape position affected soil pH and P concentrations; however, depth and landscape position interactions were observed for soil pH, P, and K concentrations. The lowest soil pH and P concentrations were measured from the sideslope position, while K concentrations did not exhibit consistent distributions across landscape positions. Future soil testing of Coastal Plain fields to account for erosion of the landscape may help direct future sampling methodology and interpretations for nutrient management.
650 $aAGRICULTURA DE PRECISIÒN
650 $aCONSERVACION DE SUELOS
650 $aFERTILIDAD
650 $aMANEJO DE SUELOS
650 $aNUTRIENTES
650 $aSUELOS
650 $aVARIABILIDAD ESPACIAL
700 1 $aTERRA, J.A.
700 1 $aSHAW, J.N.
700 1 $aREEVES, D.W.
700 1 $aRAPER, R.L.
773 $tJournal of Soils and Water Conservation, 2005$gv.60 (6), p. 431-437.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
02/03/2018 |
|
Actualizado : |
02/03/2018 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Informes Agroclimáticos |
|
Autor : |
GIMÉNEZ, A.; CAL, A.; TISCORNIA, G.; SCHIAVI, C. |
|
Afiliación : |
AGUSTIN EDUARDO GIMÉNEZ FUREST, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ADRIAN TABARE CAL ALVAREZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUADALUPE TISCORNIA TOSAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARLOS IGNACIO SCHIAVI RAMPELBERG, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Informe agroclimático 2018 - Situación a Febrero. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2018. |
|
Páginas : |
4 p. |
|
Serie : |
(Informe Agroclimático; 142) |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Palabras claves : |
AGROCLIMA; AGROCLIMATOLOGÍA; BOLETIN AGROCLIMÁTICO; CARACTERIZACIÓN AGROCLIMÁTICA; DIRECCION VIENTO; ESTACIONES AGROMETEOROLOGICAS; ESTACIONES AUTOMATICAS; ESTACIONES INIA; ESTADO DEL TIEMPO; ESTRÉS HÍDRICO; GRAFICAS AGROCLIMATICOS; GRAS; HELIOFANOGRAFO; INFORMACION SATELITAL; INFORME AGROCLIMÁTICO 2018; INUNDACIONES; LLUVIAS DIARIAS; MAXIMA; MEDIA; MINIMA; PANEL SOLAR; PERSPECTIVAS CLIMATICAS; PLUVIOMETRO; PRECIPITACION NACIONAL; PREVENCION HELADAS; PRONOSTICO; SENSOR; SIMETRICO; TANQUE A; TERMOCUPLAS; TERMOHIDROGRAFO; VARIABLES AGROCLIMATICAS; VELETA. |
|
Thesagro : |
AGROCLIMATOLOGIA; CAMBIO CLIMATICO; CLIMA; CLIMATOLOGIA; ESTACIONES METEOROLOGICAS; ESTRES HIDRICO; EVAPORACION; EVAPOTRANSPIRACION; HUMEDAD; HUMEDAD RELATIVA; LLUVIA; METEOROLOGIA; PERSPECTIVAS; PLUVIOMETROS; PRONOSTICO DEL TIEMPO; SENSORES; SISTEMAS; SISTEMAS DE INFORMACION; SUELO; TEMPERATURA; TERMOMETROS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
P40 Meteorología y climatología |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/8827/1/Informe-agroclimatico-INIA-GRAS-Febrero-de-2018.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02128nam a2200805 a 4500
001 1058185
005 2018-03-02
008 2018 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aGIMÉNEZ, A.
245 $aInforme agroclimático 2018 - Situación a Febrero.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aMontevideo (Uruguay): INIA$c2018
300 $a4 p.
490 $a(Informe Agroclimático; 142)
650 $aAGROCLIMATOLOGIA
650 $aCAMBIO CLIMATICO
650 $aCLIMA
650 $aCLIMATOLOGIA
650 $aESTACIONES METEOROLOGICAS
650 $aESTRES HIDRICO
650 $aEVAPORACION
650 $aEVAPOTRANSPIRACION
650 $aHUMEDAD
650 $aHUMEDAD RELATIVA
650 $aLLUVIA
650 $aMETEOROLOGIA
650 $aPERSPECTIVAS
650 $aPLUVIOMETROS
650 $aPRONOSTICO DEL TIEMPO
650 $aSENSORES
650 $aSISTEMAS
650 $aSISTEMAS DE INFORMACION
650 $aSUELO
650 $aTEMPERATURA
650 $aTERMOMETROS
653 $aAGROCLIMA
653 $aAGROCLIMATOLOGÍA
653 $aBOLETIN AGROCLIMÁTICO
653 $aCARACTERIZACIÓN AGROCLIMÁTICA
653 $aDIRECCION VIENTO
653 $aESTACIONES AGROMETEOROLOGICAS
653 $aESTACIONES AUTOMATICAS
653 $aESTACIONES INIA
653 $aESTADO DEL TIEMPO
653 $aESTRÉS HÍDRICO
653 $aGRAFICAS AGROCLIMATICOS
653 $aGRAS
653 $aHELIOFANOGRAFO
653 $aINFORMACION SATELITAL
653 $aINFORME AGROCLIMÁTICO 2018
653 $aINUNDACIONES
653 $aLLUVIAS DIARIAS
653 $aMAXIMA
653 $aMEDIA
653 $aMINIMA
653 $aPANEL SOLAR
653 $aPERSPECTIVAS CLIMATICAS
653 $aPLUVIOMETRO
653 $aPRECIPITACION NACIONAL
653 $aPREVENCION HELADAS
653 $aPRONOSTICO
653 $aSENSOR
653 $aSIMETRICO
653 $aTANQUE A
653 $aTERMOCUPLAS
653 $aTERMOHIDROGRAFO
653 $aVARIABLES AGROCLIMATICAS
653 $aVELETA
700 1 $aCAL, A.
700 1 $aTISCORNIA, G.
700 1 $aSCHIAVI, C.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
